tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6218425307646186309.post4207636063943345680..comments2023-09-24T08:17:35.932-04:00Comments on Pontifex Libris: "A backup isn't a backup if it's your only copy."JoAnnahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01904747145698764494noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6218425307646186309.post-16420108152545997922012-10-11T07:37:40.069-04:002012-10-11T07:37:40.069-04:00“Ideally, backups should be stored in a different ...“Ideally, backups should be stored in a different physical location from the source drive. That way, if one gets damaged, there is a greater chance that the other copy will survive unharmed and recoverable.” Good point, and that is why it really pays to have a back up copy of your every important file. It does not only apply to private individuals, but also to different businesses that own and Rubyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16314434089797506245noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6218425307646186309.post-46295602183788679072012-08-31T11:42:19.611-04:002012-08-31T11:42:19.611-04:00"A backup isn't a backup if it's your..."A backup isn't a backup if it's your only copy." – It’s a good thing you’ve pointed this out. There should be no less than two separate copies of your data. Have a backup of a backup. Another thing I may add is: test the backup from time to time. Do not go on believing that the software could get it right all the time. Try restoring them in various locations. This will reveal Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01562974754557255318noreply@blogger.com